| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:31:24 +0100 "Stefan Schweizer" |
| 3 |
> <genstef@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | What about if we just skip your "policies" and let the overlays be a |
| 5 |
> | free place where people can handle issues how they think it is right |
| 6 |
> | for the specific case and not how $super_dev said somewhere. That is |
| 7 |
> | what overlays are about, not? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Sounds like a perfect way to break lots and lots of systems. Those |
| 10 |
> policies are mostly there for good reason. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
You want to apply policies on overlays? Well no - sorry, overlays are |
| 13 |
none of QA's or any other policy business. They are overlays, not |
| 14 |
official tree. If user installs ebuilds from overlay and breaks his |
| 15 |
system, then well - not a Gentoo problem. Why should any policies apply? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Jakub Moc |
| 22 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 23 |
GPG signature: |
| 24 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 25 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives