Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 02:40:45
Message-Id: 2B1E46E2-A1D6-4EAB-962E-FEB258B815A3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams by Rolf Eike Beer
On January 2, 2020 6:35:08 PM EST, Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de> wrote:
>Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 00:25:06 CET schrieb Mike Pagano: >> On Thursday, January 2, 2020 3:32:12 PM EST Rolf Eike Beer wrote: >> > > - Allowed a simple "Add keyword(s) <y..> for package <x>" >interface, >> > > >> > > that intelligently created an issue and a target list, and then >once >> > > the list was built, constantly ensured the list to be valid, or >> > > determined automatically when sub-work was completed and >reducing the >> > > published list automatically, and then responded to potential >issues >> > > based on changes in git, ( as opposed to being only triggered >when >> > > the bug was touched ) >> > >> > As someone who does both keywordings and stabilizations regularly >on hppa >> >> > and sparc I think I must share a bit of my experiences: >> <snip> >> >> hppa is making us keep old kernels around [1]. Should the kernel >team be >> doing more to get your attention then CC'ing hppa on all of the >kernel >> STABLEREQ bugs [2]? > >I only run vanilla-sources since there are still lot of cache >corruption >problems in hppa kernels, or whatever makes them flaky. > >Linux pioneer 5.4.6-parisc64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 27 10:23:09 CET 2019 >parisc64 >PA8800 (Mako) 9000/785/C8000 GNU/Linux >Linux voyager 5.4.6-parisc #1 Fri Dec 27 15:46:43 CET 2019 parisc >PA8600 (PCX- >W+) 9000/785/C3600 GNU/Linux > >So _I_ personally would say just drop old kernels, but that is in no >way >authorative. > >Eike
Ugh. gentoo-sources is just a patch (trivial) on top of vanilla-kernel sources of each stable and LTS version. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.