Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams

[Aaron Bauman]

On January 2, 2020 6:35:08 PM EST, Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de> wrote:
>Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 00:25:06 CET schrieb Mike Pagano:
>> On Thursday, January 2, 2020 3:32:12 PM EST Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>> > > - Allowed a simple "Add keyword(s) <y..> for package <x>"
>interface,
>> > >
>> > >   that intelligently created an issue and a target list, and then
>once
>> > >   the list was built, constantly ensured the list to be valid, or
>> > >   determined automatically when sub-work was completed and
>reducing the
>> > >   published list automatically, and then responded to potential
>issues
>> > >   based on changes in git, ( as opposed to being only triggered
>when
>> > >   the bug was touched )
>> >
>> > As someone who does both keywordings and stabilizations regularly
>on hppa
>>
>> > and sparc I think I must share a bit of my experiences:
>> <snip>
>>
>> hppa is making us keep old kernels around [1].  Should the kernel
>team be
>> doing more to get your attention then CC'ing hppa on all of the
>kernel
>> STABLEREQ bugs [2]?
>
>I only run vanilla-sources since there are still lot of cache
>corruption
>problems in hppa kernels, or whatever makes them flaky.
>
>Linux pioneer 5.4.6-parisc64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 27 10:23:09 CET 2019
>parisc64
>PA8800 (Mako) 9000/785/C8000 GNU/Linux
>Linux voyager 5.4.6-parisc #1 Fri Dec 27 15:46:43 CET 2019 parisc
>PA8600 (PCX-
>W+) 9000/785/C3600 GNU/Linux
>
>So _I_ personally would say just drop old kernels, but that is in no
>way
>authorative.
>
>Eike

Ugh. gentoo-sources is just a patch (trivial) on top of vanilla-kernel sources of each stable and LTS version.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.