Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Mario Fetka (geos_one)" <mario.fetka@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:05:27
Message-Id: 200912260842.41031.mario.fetka@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns by Victor Ostorga
1 Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 06:47:51 schrieb Victor Ostorga:
2 > On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
3 >
4 > Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> wrote:
5 > > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
6 > >
7 > > Victor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> wrote:
8 > > > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> (23 Dec 2009)
9 > > > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
10 > > > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
11 > > > # Removal in 30 days
12 > > > net-dns/ldapdns
13 > >
14 > > So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
15 > > want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
16 >
17 > Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
18 >
19 > > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
20 > > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
21 >
22 > Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
23 > point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
24 > if it is still functional.
25 >
26 > [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
27 >
28 and also powerdns
29 has ldap support
30 the bind sdb ldap backand is in tree
31 both ldap backands share the same ldap structure with some small diffferences
32
33 Mario