1 |
Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 06:47:51 schrieb Victor Ostorga: |
2 |
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600 |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Victor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> (23 Dec 2009) |
9 |
> > > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current |
10 |
> > > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956 |
11 |
> > > # Removal in 30 days |
12 |
> > > net-dns/ldapdns |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you |
15 |
> > want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to |
20 |
> > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some |
23 |
> point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know |
24 |
> if it is still functional. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/ |
27 |
> |
28 |
and also powerdns |
29 |
has ldap support |
30 |
the bind sdb ldap backand is in tree |
31 |
both ldap backands share the same ldap structure with some small diffferences |
32 |
|
33 |
Mario |