| 1 |
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800 |
| 2 |
Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600 |
| 5 |
> Victor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > # Víctor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> (23 Dec 2009) |
| 9 |
> > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current |
| 10 |
> > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956 |
| 11 |
> > # Removal in 30 days |
| 12 |
> > net-dns/ldapdns |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you |
| 16 |
> want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to |
| 21 |
> s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some |
| 24 |
point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know |
| 25 |
if it is still functional. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/ |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Víctor |
Archives