Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:12:14
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=1sd9WNiAbF4m0Xkx5R56_PUvX5LsdqzK4SP4CpTJPRg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions by Matt Turner
1 On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
3 >> I personally tend to favor a mandatory DCO (we absolutely need to know
4 >> the copyright status of our code), and a voluntary FLA (which I tend
5 >> to prefer to outright assignment as I think it lines up well with our
6 >> always-free social contract).
7 >
8 > Do you have any ideas about how that might work for previous
9 > contributions? Plenty of developers have come and gone (and died!)
10 > since gentoo began accepting commits.
11 >
12
13 Existing copyright headers would be grandfathered as-is unless
14 somebody comes forward with a specific concern. Over time the tree
15 just improves. That is my suggestion at least, it is certainly no
16 worse than we are today, and a decade from now the really old stuff
17 will be gone.
18
19 --
20 Rich