Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions | ||
| Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:48:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38GrAL3+-8jz_gyb-EyXz+tYet=noiiFQUK==+pTntkBBg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > I personally tend to favor a mandatory DCO (we absolutely need to know |
| 3 | > the copyright status of our code), and a voluntary FLA (which I tend |
| 4 | > to prefer to outright assignment as I think it lines up well with our |
| 5 | > always-free social contract). |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Do you have any ideas about how that might work for previous |
| 8 | contributions? Plenty of developers have come and gone (and died!) |
| 9 | since gentoo began accepting commits. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |