Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:31:21
Message-Id: 8003d6c5-0162-4ceb-fc35-2093cc8bbbe3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process by Michael Palimaka
1 On 29/12/16 03:49, Michael Palimaka wrote:
2 > On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
3 >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
4 >>
5 >>> with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and
6 >>> the support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some
7 >>> changes on our bugzilla have been done.
8 >>
9 >> Thank you for the great work.
10 >>
11 >>> [...]
12 >>
13 >>> When you will choose one of those, you will see two new fields:
14 >>> - Atoms to stabilize
15 >>
16 >> Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we are
17 >> trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't define
18 >> the term [2].
19 >
20 > Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be
21 > stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both
22 > components.
23 >
24 >
25
26 ago suggested "Packages list" or "Package list" - thoughts?

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>