1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 08/06/2013 11:46 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
5 |
> 23:37:25 <willikins> rej, you have notes! [21:13] <mrueg> Let me |
6 |
> rephrase this: Just a friendly notice to please refrain from |
7 |
> rephrasing bug summaries from "Stabilize ${P}" to "${P} stable |
8 |
> req". This just adds unneeded noise to the bug. I don't want this |
9 |
> on bugs I've reported or am assigned to. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> This is my equally short and "friendly" note: It's not going to |
13 |
> happen. Forget about it. They are not "your" bug reports and anyone |
14 |
> is actually /welcome/ to improve them. Get used to it. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> To get technical on the "improvement" bit, we have agreed time on |
17 |
> time that stating the atom and then the action is the way to go. |
18 |
> The main reasons is that it helps people who need to regularly read |
19 |
> /lists/ of bug summaries sort them better. Until we get a specific |
20 |
> [Atoms] field implemented, it will need to stay this way. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Besides the finer technical points of bug maintenance, it simply |
23 |
> infuriates me that anyone would think of bug reports in the |
24 |
> possessive. This is not the way to improve the distro. You're on |
25 |
> the wrong track there. And you weren't being friendly. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> No kind regards to the sender, jer |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
Hello Jeroen, |
32 |
|
33 |
first of all I welcome and appreciate the work all members of the |
34 |
other bug wranglers project[1] and you do. |
35 |
But please let's tell the whole story from the beginning, so we get a |
36 |
better picture. |
37 |
|
38 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442442 |
39 |
|
40 |
Arches were added before. |
41 |
|
42 |
Jeroen Roovers 2013-08-06 12:46:43 UTC |
43 |
Summary: Stabilize net-print/foomatic-db-4.0.20120831, |
44 |
net-print/foomatic-db-ppds-20120831, |
45 |
net-print/foomatic-db-engine-4.0.8 → |
46 |
net-print/foomatic-db-4.0.20120831 net-print/foomatic-db-ppds-20120831 |
47 |
net-print/foomatic-db-engine-4.0.8 stable request |
48 |
|
49 |
Jeroen Roovers 2013-08-06 12:48:22 UTC |
50 |
Summary: net-print/foomatic-db-4.0.20120831 |
51 |
net-print/foomatic-db-ppds-20120831 net-print/foomatic-db-engine-4.0.8 |
52 |
stable request → net-print/foomatic-db-4.0.20120831 |
53 |
net-print/foomatic-db-ppds-4.0.20120831 |
54 |
net-print/foomatic-db-engine-4.0.8 stable request |
55 |
|
56 |
<mrueg> rej: for the future: please don't change the summary field in |
57 |
my bugs. thank you. |
58 |
<rej> mrueg: I have no idea what you are talking about. |
59 |
<rej> mrueg: I have no idea what you mean by "[your] bugs" so I'll |
60 |
keep ignoring that. |
61 |
|
62 |
I wasn't able to respond, because you were offline and I sent you the |
63 |
note, that you've already quoted, via willikins. That my second note |
64 |
was a bit harsh, emerged from the fact, that you seemed to be |
65 |
unwillingly to discuss this ("ignoring"). |
66 |
|
67 |
But before we get to the core, let's check some preliminaries: |
68 |
|
69 |
a) The bug wranglers project states their goal (I stressed the |
70 |
important things) as following: |
71 |
"The goal of the Bug Wranglers project is to clarify how _new_ bugs on |
72 |
Gentoo's bug tracker should be handled. This document describes the |
73 |
rules to bug _assignment_, CC'ing herd teams, maintainers, the role of |
74 |
metadata.xml and herds.xml, who are bug wranglers and how one should |
75 |
contact them." [1] |
76 |
|
77 |
b) "Possessing bugs": |
78 |
I'm aware of the fact that bugs aren't possesed by me (although |
79 |
there's a bug search link called "My Bugs"), but I don't want to |
80 |
neglect the fact, that I have certain responsibilites when bugs are |
81 |
assigned to me or I've reported them. Both require the effort to |
82 |
provide information to get the bug fixed. Under no circumstances this |
83 |
effort should be disturbed. |
84 |
|
85 |
c) "Improvements" |
86 |
I like the fact that you and all other who have the possibility to |
87 |
change bug summaries, use their power to add _more_ information to the |
88 |
bug summary. But I feel the strong need to stress the word "more". |
89 |
Anything else is just noise and should be avoided. |
90 |
|
91 |
d) "Agreements" |
92 |
I think it is a good idea to create a certain format for bug |
93 |
summaries, when they include default tasks like keywording or |
94 |
stabilization. |
95 |
|
96 |
|
97 |
To make the long story short: |
98 |
|
99 |
I conclude from a), that the responsiblities of the bug wranglers |
100 |
project end, when the assignee field is set to another one than |
101 |
bug-wranglers@g.o. If this is wrong or outdated, please change the |
102 |
goals of the bug-wranglers or create a new project for these goals. |
103 |
|
104 |
I conclude from a) and b), although you are the lead of the bug |
105 |
wranglers project, you have _no_ responsibilities regards this bug as |
106 |
there exists no relationship between you and this bug (Except for your |
107 |
membership in hppa (which was added to CC), but I'd say it is not main |
108 |
task of an arch team to adjust bug summaries and I hope you're |
109 |
d'accord with this one.). |
110 |
|
111 |
I conclude from d), that there exists some kind of documentation |
112 |
(gentoo-dev does not count as a documentation) you could have pointed |
113 |
me at (instead of telling me you ignore my comment), as you might have |
114 |
noticed that I joined the project recently. |
115 |
If this doc does not exist, I'd like you to respect my way to work at |
116 |
b.g.o and the wish, that I don't want to see any future noise (as |
117 |
described in c) ) on bugs that I'm related to (as assignee or reporter). |
118 |
|
119 |
|
120 |
Thank you very much for your understanding. |
121 |
|
122 |
|
123 |
With kind regards to everyone |
124 |
|
125 |
Manuel |
126 |
|
127 |
|
128 |
|
129 |
[1] https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml |
130 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
131 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
132 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
133 |
|
134 |
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSAn7rXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci0uLi5Abm90YXRpb25zLm9w |
135 |
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4MDA1RERERkM0ODM2QkE4MEY3NzY0N0M1 |
136 |
OEZCQTM2QzhEOUQ2MzVDAAoJEFj7o2yNnWNcSI8P/0XJuwtHZdQjamPCRarf2TPX |
137 |
RyDMpL8zHXc/PZb1J9uEY7D9maBh08ty5UBaIPuN8gBBMFJINmzSTztruL6P3iHf |
138 |
DHXXbF6xEypdyKLA/0sjy5FJt9Etq+ucFUMUlq5/icTzUmGHjlo93LBnUQuiq15V |
139 |
m8zDXY9AbfChrLgUgASAoB9IkpnowNJmXkLy1j7Ld8xKUFn6zvrSs+t3fYKe+JvE |
140 |
R+o0r8pAbNZxUiwNe6ld5cY/KZquyWOG5Bp3LJ5dP0Jri4OYfmpyPPbMZGzoS1Rh |
141 |
0fsrjkmbW9dqSYiPNlB7oyGL8LKnLBKcUpUgewD7P2+EWG+SzbZYYFHg7hwVGzud |
142 |
GUjIyPHxubAJFA0SEB+JKPZcdcVokp5nhE9N6xltaMTJ9YTCUa1lVhUCvrPi19Q9 |
143 |
Yi1ulB+80MQj/3U5U6xKR2J72yEYpzGS+vDueKHUzHtyDcYegw3WuHRPKpAWY2zD |
144 |
KH9zLYu9fIzVkUExRab5fK08kHikF7Qbq9KEx9iUcgD+Prni+lEwj0j3UMoXn6p/ |
145 |
+Yh3bevFwges0bIXqjni+FkeHJySfI4R6zXhtX1/bHmysHpj1keV/lzvIog2V9oI |
146 |
vNDaNZOsa+Z3dZYQ6ruM0stCTNAItvKcGoL+zg9esrbGQq1Yz4lLHlYMnjFMU98g |
147 |
HqFJgLe4KRMOdBCFPeIC |
148 |
=znjZ |
149 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |