| 1 |
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 18:29 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> | The question was specifically in regards to timelines; completion so |
| 3 |
> | that ongoing paludis vs pkgcore vs portage crap can be put to rest. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> *shrug* I don't see PMS as being viable until there's a fully |
| 6 |
> conformant independent implementation, personally. So that more or |
| 7 |
> less means that for me, PMS will become a priority at around the same |
| 8 |
> time that Paludis 1.0_pre is released. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Are you really saying that you won't be releasing this information until |
| 11 |
such time as *Paludis* meets it, even though portage/pkgcore may not? |
| 12 |
Isn't the *point* of this spec to try to bring everyone on the same |
| 13 |
page? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 17 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 18 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 19 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 20 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives