| 1 |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:22:14 -0800 Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Perhaps not all of the council; distinctly recall diego pushing about |
| 4 |
| it though. Quick look through council logs, robbat2 was asking about |
| 5 |
| timeline also (jan. meeting specifically). |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You've gotta ask *why* certain people are so keen on pushing it |
| 8 |
through... Perhaps if they explained why they needed it in such a hurry |
| 9 |
we would prioritise it differently. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
| > Several council member have access to it - including me - and |
| 12 |
| > are quite confident about what is already done. |
| 13 |
| |
| 14 |
| The question was specifically in regards to timelines; completion so |
| 15 |
| that ongoing paludis vs pkgcore vs portage crap can be put to rest. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
*shrug* I don't see PMS as being viable until there's a fully |
| 18 |
conformant independent implementation, personally. So that more or |
| 19 |
less means that for me, PMS will become a priority at around the same |
| 20 |
time that Paludis 1.0_pre is released. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 24 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 25 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 26 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
Archives