| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:08:14PM +0100, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 18:33 schrieb Brian Harring: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:22:59PM +0000, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:24:54 -0800 |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > Possible they've gone and shifted the name (or disabled |
| 8 |
> > > > notification); either way, think it's probably worth getting a |
| 9 |
> > > > status update on it in council this coming month. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Right now I'm placing a higher priority on getting a degree. It'll |
| 12 |
> > > be done when it's done, which is not now. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Council- y'all were after getting this finished as far as I know, |
| 15 |
> > perhaps you could discuss intentions? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Why? There is work done on this, and there will be further work being |
| 18 |
> done. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The question of 'when' comes to mind; he's busy, which is fine- |
| 21 |
originally however, recall the council pushing for it to be finished. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Perhaps not all of the council; distinctly recall diego pushing about |
| 24 |
it though. Quick look through council logs, robbat2 was asking about |
| 25 |
timeline also (jan. meeting specifically). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Several council member have access to it - including me - and |
| 29 |
> are quite confident about what is already done. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
The question was specifically in regards to timelines; completion so |
| 32 |
that ongoing paludis vs pkgcore vs portage crap can be put to rest. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Offhand, if the council (majority, no offense meant but not just |
| 35 |
one council member who is also a paludis dev) is happy with the state |
| 36 |
of things and timelines, then I'll gladly retract the request. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
~harring |
Archives