| 1 |
On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 14:56 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:33:19 +0200 foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> | Every package is in some form a subset of a category of packages |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Not really, hence why solar's suggestion (which is just a formalisation |
| 6 |
> of what we're doing anyway) is such a good idea. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Well, this gets to be a yes/no thread. But I personally do not believe |
| 9 |
there are packages that cannot be categorized in meaningful way on some |
| 10 |
common denominator with other packages (read : herd). Granted, a herd |
| 11 |
may not exist yet, but thats something else. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
- foser |
Archives