1 |
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 16:54:29 +0200 foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
| On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 14:56 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
| > On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:33:19 +0200 foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
| > | Every package is in some form a subset of a category of packages |
5 |
| > |
6 |
| > Not really, hence why solar's suggestion (which is just a |
7 |
| > formalisation of what we're doing anyway) is such a good idea. |
8 |
| |
9 |
| Well, this gets to be a yes/no thread. But I personally do not believe |
10 |
| there are packages that cannot be categorized in meaningful way on |
11 |
| some common denominator with other packages (read : herd). Granted, a |
12 |
| herd may not exist yet, but thats something else. |
13 |
|
14 |
Well, that's the thing... You *could* go and create a bunch of arbitrary |
15 |
herds to cover things. But take, for example, er... dev-util/txt2regex. |
16 |
I think you'd have a hard time finding a herd for that, since there's no |
17 |
particular identifiable group of people that use both this and a half |
18 |
dozen or so other misc apps. Plus, it's such a trivial easy-to-maintain |
19 |
package that it's not worth the effort of finding additional maintainers |
20 |
and co-ordinating them. Some things really don't need a team behind |
21 |
them... |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
25 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
26 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |