Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com>, Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 08:49:00
Message-Id: uh7xvwuj2@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns by Samuel Bernardo
1 >>>>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2020, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
2
3 > No assurance is also a level that takes place in the lower ranking
4 > level. If someone needs to use zoom because they are demanded by their
5 > boss I think that would be even more useful to know that it is possible
6 > to install zoom in Gentoo and that is rated as the worst possible
7 > software. Maybe this would allow others to join our zoom claim...
8
9 We could add a README.gentoo file with our caveats. It won't be perfect,
10 but maybe better than nothing. (And certainly better than displaying a
11 warning on every upgrade, which will eventually annoy people [1].)
12
13 Any suggestions for a wording?
14
15 Ulrich
16
17
18 [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/416769

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>