Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 22:55:03
Message-Id: d52a8f83-4e4e-2f4f-0a5b-7f4dcaffbdfe@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns by Kent Fredric
1 Hi Kent,
2
3 On 4/6/20 2:08 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
4 > So no, nobody can actually make assurances of this software, we can
5 > only stipulate which cautions we know are warranted.
6
7 No assurance is also a level that takes place in the lower ranking
8 level. If someone needs to use zoom because they are demanded by their
9 boss I think that would be even more useful to know that it is possible
10 to install zoom in Gentoo and that is rated as the worst possible
11 software. Maybe this would allow others to join our zoom claim...
12
13 This is the kind of useful information that we could collect from the
14 QA, extending the greatness of the best distro ever made. The
15 availability of software from a distro is better than installing it
16 standalone, allowing to share knowledge about relevant information such
17 as security, maintenance, ...
18
19 Best,
20
21 Samuel

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] zoom concerns Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>