| 1 |
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:11:01 +0100 |
| 2 |
Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Sorry about my comment, but couldn't that be solved choosing the right |
| 5 |
> profile or opting for an official overlay, raking the assurance level of |
| 6 |
> those? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If zoom is a binary only package, not opensource, we can't make any |
| 9 |
assurances. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Even if the source is available, if we're not shipping variations of it |
| 12 |
compiled by our tools, there could be arbitrary un-evaluated extensions |
| 13 |
hiding in it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So no, nobody can actually make assurances of this software, we can |
| 16 |
only stipulate which cautions we know are warranted. |
Archives