Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: cmake + ninja vs autotools | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:17:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | ov3ir9$4pp$2@blaine.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cmake + ninja vs autotools by Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@gmail.com> | ||
| 1 | Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > 1. Doing a full clean build [..] |
| 3 | > the speed of make or ninja is hugely offset by the compilation speed, |
| 4 | > and their overhead is negligible. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | It depends on the definition of negligible. For huge projects like |
| 7 | boost or chromium it is several minutes: That's why these projects |
| 8 | switched to ninja. Admittedly, for eix the difference is probably |
| 9 | only a few seconds on most systems. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cmake + ninja vs autotools | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> |