| 1 |
On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is |
| 4 |
>> practically useless. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his |
| 7 |
>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you |
| 8 |
>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Let's just remove it. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which |
| 14 |
> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to |
| 15 |
> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be |
| 16 |
> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Why is it called "Package-Manager:" then? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
And how often was that useful in practice? |
Archives