| 1 |
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: |
| 2 |
> Is there progress being made on Apache2? It seems that that ebuild is |
| 3 |
> horribly broken (and masked). I noticed it is putting binaries into |
| 4 |
> /usr/local rather than /usr. I am beginning to hack on it, but I have also |
| 5 |
> noticed that other ebuilds, such as mod_php will not play well with an |
| 6 |
> Apache 2 installation. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
when I last looked at the apache2 ebuild it was way out of date (2.0.28) |
| 9 |
as is the SVN build. |
| 10 |
by the sounds of it apache is using it's standard layout. |
| 11 |
I was thinking that the 'opt' layout would be preferable |
| 12 |
(binaries in /opt/apache config in /etc/httpd/ html files in |
| 13 |
/usr/share/httpd) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I wonder if we might add apache2 to USE in /etc/make.conf? Can we start |
| 16 |
> making these ebuilds friendly between versions of Apache (i.e. the |
| 17 |
> aforementioned mod_php)? When can this be added to the portage tree and |
| 18 |
> unmasked? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I am asking this because many of the java development platforms I want |
| 21 |
> really will work better with Apache 2 (i.e. mod_jk2, mod_webapp). |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Thanks in advance, |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Tom Veldhouse |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 28 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 29 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 30 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 31 |
> |
Archives