Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:11:42
Message-Id: 20070225210827.6038bbcf@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Steve Long
1 On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 +0000
2 Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3
4 > Like I said, tho, I'm happy if the council is. Although I'm starting to
5 > worry at the increasingly poisonous atmosphere, and that devs are leaving.
6 > Flameeyes was on the council, no? It concerns me that this atmosphere is
7 > just intimidating people simply because no one feels confident to stand up
8 > to abusive bullying.
9
10 Diego left because he was simply burnt out, as suggested by his many blog
11 posts.
12
13 As for the poisonous atmosphere - I don't know, I feel very good among the
14 developers, and am still enjoying working on the tree just like on the day I
15 joined. Don't let few loud flamers ruin your day.
16
17 Kind regards,
18 --
19 Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <ticho at gentoo dot org>
20 Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>