| 1 |
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:22 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> And now per arch breakdowns. |
| 3 |
> http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/ |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
No offense, but that isn't exactly useful in its current form. For |
| 6 |
example, x86 shows *all* of the packages, even ones where it has a |
| 7 |
non-vulnerable version stable. I guess a breakdown of which |
| 8 |
architectures still do not have a version *higher* than the ones listed |
| 9 |
by the GLSA stable would be necessary instead. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 13 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 14 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 15 |
Games - Developer |
| 16 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives