Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps

[hasufell]

Martin Vaeth:
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
>> Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote:
>>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
>>>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g.
>>>> when subslots are in use)
>>> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken.
>>
>> Yes they are.
>
> Could you please stop your childish behaviour?
>
>>> What is broken is that portage does not use them consistently.
>>
>> Because using them consistently is impossible by design.
>
> It seems that *you* should take some reading before you
> continue with discussion.
>
>

I think no one cares about this part of the thread anymore. Can you take
it elsewhere?