Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:04:59
Message-Id: slrnlt7grt.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
2 > Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote:
3 >> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
4 >> > Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g.
5 >> > when subslots are in use)
6 >> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken.
7 >
8 > Yes they are.
9
10 Could you please stop your childish behaviour?
11
12 >> What is broken is that portage does not use them consistently.
13 >
14 > Because using them consistently is impossible by design.
15
16 It seems that *you* should take some reading before you
17 continue with discussion.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>