| 1 |
Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> My thinking too, until I saw the portage dev (JStubbs?) mention it wasn't |
| 3 |
> needed. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I believe the thinking is that emerge --ask is basically emerge --pretend |
| 6 |
> with an opportunity to continue stuck on the end, thus eliminating running |
| 7 |
> the same command only without the --pretend again, therefore eliminating |
| 8 |
> running portage's dep calculation step twice, once for the pretend, then |
| 9 |
> again for the run. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Okay, but I'd say that Portage internals like if the the same code gets |
| 12 |
used by --ask and --pretend are not relevant for this GLEP. Why don't |
| 13 |
add a note specifying the correct behavior? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Cheers, |
| 16 |
-jkt |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives