| 1 |
Dan Meltzer wrote: |
| 2 |
>> > |
| 3 |
>> Man first you devs think it's your god-given right to behave nastily to |
| 4 |
>> any usr, then you get all sensitive about Jakub on bugzilla. That is |
| 5 |
>> lame, imo. Maybe there should be something about requiring a thick skin |
| 6 |
>> to be a dev, since you so clearly require it of usrs. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Please do some research before spouting off. Watch the bug-wranglers@ |
| 9 |
> alias for a few weeks (its too late now) to see that jakub tended to |
| 10 |
> yell and scream and make a bigger mess than he resolved a lot of the |
| 11 |
> time when it came to bug wrangling. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That's your opinion, which you're perfectly entitled to express. Others |
| 14 |
clearly disagree, so there isn't consensus by any stretch of the |
| 15 |
imagination. Mine is that the issues he raised should have been dealt with |
| 16 |
so that he didn't need to shout, and more importantly that QA was improved. |
| 17 |
Which was why he was shouting. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
And I'm not spouting off: if you expect us to deal with rude devs, they |
| 20 |
should at least be able to accept criticism from the best bug-wrangler you |
| 21 |
guys have. If it means someone needs to translate occasionally, so what? |
| 22 |
spanky did that pretty well in the cases where I needed help. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> The classic answer was always "We watch each other," but that's clearly |
| 26 |
>> not working if you are left out of a discussion regarding yourself for 9 |
| 27 |
>> months. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
Devrel==HR/Personnel imo. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
The real point is that bug-wranglers has lost over 50% of it's |
| 32 |
effectiveness, again imo. jakub and spanky are the two main guys, and it's |
| 33 |
not just the loss of jakub's prodigious work-rate, which kept a lot bugs |
| 34 |
from even reaching devs, but the loss of his influence on QA which is a |
| 35 |
complete disaster for gentoo. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives