| 1 |
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/11/14 02:16, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> When I was taking my ebuild quizzes, I asked for someone to clarify the |
| 5 |
>> implicit system dependency that we have enshrined in the devmanual: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485356 |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> There is... some agreement, but also special cases and special-special |
| 10 |
>> cases that are folklore-only at this point. To me it seems like a fine |
| 11 |
>> thing to ask the council to sort out, so I'm asking here for discussion. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Can we come up with an idiot-proof list (or FLOWCHART, even!) of what |
| 14 |
>> should and should not be excluded from *DEPEND? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Assume a C runtime and a C compiler do exist. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I would extend that to a C++ compiler and library as well. |
Archives