Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:27:42
Message-Id: 20061030202109.785c5aa3@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Jakub Moc
1 On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:50:06 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
2 | Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
3 | > | > | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is
4 | > | > | wrong on their side.
5 | > | >
6 | > | > Or it tells you where their priorities lie...
7 | > |
8 | > | Sure. So they don't need the keywords nor the package.
9 | >
10 | > No no. They might need the package, just not necessarily a
11 | > particular version.
12 |
13 | As you have might have noticed, they already have a newer version
14 | stable. But apparently asking them to respond on a bug within 5 months
15 | is way too much. :P
16
17 Well yes, since there's no clear link between bugs and packages. Things
18 can get stabled incidentally and for reasons other than the ones in one
19 particular bug.
20
21 --
22 Ciaran McCreesh
23 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
24 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
25 as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>