Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:56:55
Message-Id: 4546576E.7000305@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
2 > | > | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is wrong on
3 > | > | their side.
4 > | >
5 > | > Or it tells you where their priorities lie...
6 > |
7 > | Sure. So they don't need the keywords nor the package.
8 >
9 > No no. They might need the package, just not necessarily a particular
10 > version.
11
12 As you have might have noticed, they already have a newer version
13 stable. But apparently asking them to respond on a bug within 5 months
14 is way too much. :P
15
16
17 --
18 Best regards,
19
20 Jakub Moc
21 mailto:jakub@g.o
22 GPG signature:
23 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
24 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
25
26 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>