1 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:11:48 +0300 |
2 |
Alex Alexander <wired@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sep 22, 2012 7:38 PM, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > emerge 'foo >= 1.1' 'bar < 1.0'? |
7 |
> > emerge foo '>=' 1.1 bar '<' 1.0? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> How is the above easier to read than |
10 |
> |
11 |
> emerge >=foo-1.1 <bar-1.0 |
12 |
|
13 |
Did you even test it? That would create '=foo-1.1' and then fail trying |
14 |
to read 'bar-1.0'. It's rather: |
15 |
|
16 |
emerge '>=foo-1.1' '<bar-1.0' |
17 |
|
18 |
> I think your example is working against you*.* |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The current syntax is much easier to read than the |
21 |
> quote-and-whitespace-tracking horror of your example :-P |
22 |
|
23 |
It's no less quoting than in the current case. And it could be simply |
24 |
extended to supporting quoting-less syntax, e.g.: |
25 |
|
26 |
emerge foo -gt 1.1 bar -lt 1.0 |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Michał Górny |