| 1 |
On Thursday 05 February 2004 20:53, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> Could work, but isn't this a clumsier version of : |
| 3 |
> track ldd of foopack. |
| 4 |
> resolve all .so files |
| 5 |
> store both lists, and if the .so aren't there, spit out the "last seen |
| 6 |
> as "<package>" as a hint and refuse to install? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
This would work at packaging time, not at install time. Basically what we need |
| 9 |
is to identify incompatible library changes (besides never installing with an |
| 10 |
older version than build with) some way. We could use a LIBVER variable for |
| 11 |
that. It would be similar in function as SLOT, but it would not say anything |
| 12 |
about ability to coexist. It just says something about library conflicts. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> (still dirty.. but better than what RPM does ;) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Binary packages are dirty ;-) Anyone some idea what debian does to this |
| 17 |
respect? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Paul |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 24 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 25 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives