| 1 |
On Thursday 05 February 2004 20:58, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 05 February 2004 20:53, Spider wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Could work, but isn't this a clumsier version of : |
| 4 |
> > track ldd of foopack. |
| 5 |
> > resolve all .so files |
| 6 |
> > store both lists, and if the .so aren't there, spit out the "last seen |
| 7 |
> > as "<package>" as a hint and refuse to install? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This would work at packaging time, not at install time. Basically what we |
| 10 |
> need is to identify incompatible library changes (besides never installing |
| 11 |
> with an older version than build with) some way. We could use a LIBVER |
| 12 |
> variable for that. It would be similar in function as SLOT, but it would |
| 13 |
> not say anything about ability to coexist. It just says something about |
| 14 |
> library conflicts. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > (still dirty.. but better than what RPM does ;) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
My "hack" does something similar as rpm does when packaging up (they record |
| 19 |
all library versions, but forget where to get them) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Paul |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 27 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives