| 1 |
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 4:05, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> Because then any script that refers to /bin/bash during the installation |
| 3 |
> process uses the static bash, while the purpose is this the dynamic bash |
| 4 |
> is used. Of course all the scripts could be patched, but then the use of |
| 5 |
> the sandbox gets quite a bit devaluated. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Fair enough. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Joshua Pollak wrote: |
| 11 |
> >Hi, |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> >Just wondering, but I had a suggestion for the dynamic bash ebuild: Rather |
| 14 |
> >than replacing the static bash and moving the static bash to /bin/sbash |
| 15 |
> >(shouldn't that be /sbin/sbash?) anyway, why not just install the new |
| 16 |
> > shell to /bin/dyn-bash or dbash or something, and make the sandbox |
| 17 |
> > scripts call everything via that shell? |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> >I'm not sure if that's technically possible or not, but it seemed like it |
| 20 |
> >would make a lot of things simpler, and reduce the risk of sysadmins |
| 21 |
> > messing something up. |
| 22 |
> >_______________________________________________ |
| 23 |
> >gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 24 |
> >gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 25 |
> >http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 28 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 29 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 30 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives