| 1 |
Because then any script that refers to /bin/bash during the installation |
| 2 |
process uses the static bash, while the purpose is this the dynamic bash |
| 3 |
is used. Of course all the scripts could be patched, but then the use of |
| 4 |
the sandbox gets quite a bit devaluated. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Joshua Pollak wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>Hi, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>Just wondering, but I had a suggestion for the dynamic bash ebuild: Rather |
| 11 |
>than replacing the static bash and moving the static bash to /bin/sbash |
| 12 |
>(shouldn't that be /sbin/sbash?) anyway, why not just install the new shell |
| 13 |
>to /bin/dyn-bash or dbash or something, and make the sandbox scripts call |
| 14 |
>everything via that shell? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>I'm not sure if that's technically possible or not, but it seemed like it |
| 17 |
>would make a lot of things simpler, and reduce the risk of sysadmins messing |
| 18 |
>something up. |
| 19 |
>_______________________________________________ |
| 20 |
>gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 21 |
>gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 22 |
>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 23 |
> |
Archives