| 1 |
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:23, Sven Köhler wrote: |
| 2 |
> After reading all the concerns and doubt and things, i ask myself: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> why not keep in a tmpfs? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well, it can be swapped out too, and it isn't too much data anyway, is it? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Only linux has a non specific tmpfs - ie it just uses what it needs. |
| 9 |
For the BSD's it has something similar, but you have to specify either it's |
| 10 |
size or it's maximum size so it's not as flexable. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> The most disturbing thing to me, would be yet another entry when i watch |
| 13 |
> the list mountpoints. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
One of the reasons I'm keen on rolling it back to disk after rc completes the |
| 16 |
boot runlevel. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> |
| 20 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives