1 |
I would love to have seperate ebuilds for the parts of KDE, many of the |
2 |
packages I compile are for only one program. |
3 |
|
4 |
On Monday 13 May 2002 12:36 pm, Dan Armak wrote: |
5 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
6 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
7 |
> |
8 |
> On Monday 13 May 2002 14:18, Eric Noack wrote: |
9 |
> > > Hello everyone, |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > During the last week I've been working on separating the > kde-base/* |
12 |
> > > packages into 'child' packages, a feature requested by some > people. |
13 |
> > > For example, instead of kdenetwork we'd have separate kmail, > knode, |
14 |
> > > kppp etc. ebuilds. The actual eclass framework to do this is > ready. |
15 |
> > > ... |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > As a Gentoo user my humble opinion is that being able to install single |
18 |
> > parts of things like KDE is much more important than compile-time. |
19 |
> > Specially huge packages like KDE which takes real long time to compile |
20 |
> > anyway are things one would probably compile "over-night" if one wants |
21 |
> > the whole package, so additional 1 or 2 hours wont count. And if one |
22 |
> > doesnt want to install the whole thing, one would be glad to be able to |
23 |
> > choose what to install and what not. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > Make it so, and keep up the good work. :-) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> It wouldn't be another hour or two. More like another four. Which is a lot, |
28 |
> and not everyone compiles kde by night. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> This seems like a case where the benefits and problems of a new feature are |
31 |
> more or less balanced. Hmmm..... |
32 |
> |
33 |
> - -- |
34 |
> Dan Armak |
35 |
> Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
36 |
> Matan, Israel |
37 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
38 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
39 |
> |
40 |
> iD8DBQE83/mwUI2RQ41fiVERAsS+AJsErRZfal3gMFg37/LtuhFKpkFKrACfZvMo |
41 |
> U+Ar3OZLGdAWzDbx32CZ8RY= |
42 |
> =CZfB |
43 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
44 |
> |
45 |
> _______________________________________________ |
46 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
47 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
48 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |