Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: KDE 'child' packages (separate ebuilds for konqueror kmail etc.)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 12:38:46
Message-Id: 200205132036.48802.danarmak@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: KDE 'child' packages (separate ebuilds for konqueror kmail etc.) by Eric Noack
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Monday 13 May 2002 14:18, Eric Noack wrote:
5 > > Hello everyone,
6 > >
7 > > During the last week I've been working on separating the > kde-base/*
8 > > packages into 'child' packages, a feature requested by some > people.
9 > > For example, instead of kdenetwork we'd have separate kmail, > knode,
10 > > kppp etc. ebuilds. The actual eclass framework to do this is > ready. ...
11 >
12 > As a Gentoo user my humble opinion is that being able to install single
13 > parts of things like KDE is much more important than compile-time.
14 > Specially huge packages like KDE which takes real long time to compile
15 > anyway are things one would probably compile "over-night" if one wants the
16 > whole package, so additional 1 or 2 hours wont count. And if one doesnt
17 > want to install the whole thing, one would be glad to be able to choose
18 > what to install and what not.
19 >
20 > Make it so, and keep up the good work. :-)
21
22 It wouldn't be another hour or two. More like another four. Which is a lot,
23 and not everyone compiles kde by night.
24
25 This seems like a case where the benefits and problems of a new feature are
26 more or less balanced. Hmmm.....
27
28 - --
29 Dan Armak
30 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
31 Matan, Israel
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
34
35 iD8DBQE83/mwUI2RQ41fiVERAsS+AJsErRZfal3gMFg37/LtuhFKpkFKrACfZvMo
36 U+Ar3OZLGdAWzDbx32CZ8RY=
37 =CZfB
38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies