1 |
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 06:48:54AM +0000, Steven J. Long wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:31:08PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:47:05PM -0500, Wyatt Epp wrote: |
4 |
> > > But let's be real here: if I install something and |
5 |
> > > want to configure its system-wide bits, the first place I go is ALWAYS |
6 |
> > > /etc. When I don't find it there, with the rest of the system config |
7 |
> > > files, my day gets a little worse and I lose a bit of time trying to |
8 |
> > > interrogate a search engine for the answer. And that's annoying. |
9 |
> > > That sucks. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > This hasn't changed. |
12 |
> > The configuration files these packages are putting in /lib are not |
13 |
> > meant to be edited; they are the package provided defaults. If you want |
14 |
> > to override one of them, you do that in a file with the same path and |
15 |
> > name in /etc, like I mentioned in another message in this thread. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> The problem, as has been explained many many times, is that the rest |
18 |
> of the config is somewhere random on the system. But you knew that, |
19 |
> right? You were just telling a half-truth, effectively. |
20 |
|
21 |
No sir, I was not telling a half-truth. |
22 |
|
23 |
If the default configuration is stored in /lib/udev/rules.d for example, |
24 |
and you can override that default by dropping files of the same name in |
25 |
/etc/udev/rules.d, I don't see what the concern is. |
26 |
|
27 |
> I for one prefer a distro to do a bit of work and make my life easier, |
28 |
> since it makes life easier for everyone who uses the distro. Why the |
29 |
> hell should I care if some bindist can't etc-update? WTF does that |
30 |
> have to do with Gentoo? |
31 |
|
32 |
With this method, you don't need to etc-update, so I would say that in a |
33 |
way this is easier. Your system-admin-provided files in /etc are not |
34 |
owned by the packages, just the files in /lib are. |
35 |
|
36 |
> If I wanted a shitty distro that didn't bother to do anything at |
37 |
> all, I'd use LFS. At least they don't pretend, then fall over themselves |
38 |
> to do a crap load of work rather than admit a mistake; that hey, y'know |
39 |
> what? Some of those things from 30 years ago were a damn good idea, |
40 |
> and maybe just maybe, they worked some of these issues out back then, |
41 |
> so we could stand on their shoulders instead of digging through |
42 |
> their garbage. |
43 |
|
44 |
I'm not totally against keeping things from the past. It is just a case |
45 |
of evaluating those things and seeing whether they are still relevant. |