| 1 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> Branko Badrljica wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that |
| 5 |
>> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check |
| 6 |
>> for this kind of thing in portage ? |
| 7 |
>> At the very least failed cp should stop emerge... |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Well there isn't a single place to add die statements. The important |
| 13 |
> thing is for ebuild developers to remember to add || die to all stuff |
| 14 |
> that could potentially fail. If you find the cp in question that failed |
| 15 |
> for you, the right place to file bugs is https://bugs.gentoo.org. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Regards, |
| 18 |
> Petteri |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
Looks like people have been truly over-zealous when removing "die" |
| 22 |
statements from ebuilds lately. I've added back to HAL an assortment of |
| 23 |
"die" statements. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I hope this hasn't happened in too many other ebuilds. |
Archives