| 1 |
Michał Górny posted on Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:15:10 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:51:50 +0800 Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>> When upstream moved the udev sources to the systemd repo, they promised |
| 7 |
>> that udev would continue to be able to be used separately from systemd. |
| 8 |
>> We should hold them to that promise. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> If they break their promise (as it seems they are bent on doing), then |
| 11 |
>> we should go ahead with the fork as discussed earlier. I'm sure other |
| 12 |
>> distros such as Debian and Slackware would be happy to join us in that |
| 13 |
>> effort. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> If we fork, then I would expect systemd to actually require its own udev |
| 16 |
> which means that systemd would need to build it anyway. What's the |
| 17 |
> point? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Being able to choose not to run systemd at all? If there's no need to |
| 21 |
build systemd, than what it requires is irrelevant. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 25 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 26 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives