| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing header) |
| 3 |
> patches will be applied by me in the coming week. If you have concerns |
| 4 |
> about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my hands first), |
| 5 |
> please let me know. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> As always, applying these patches yourself makes me a happy monkey. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'll try to have this done by the end of the week. I will also handle |
| 10 |
> filing of stabilization bugs for these packages at the end of |
| 11 |
> February. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=198121&max |
| 14 |
> depth=1&hide_resolved=1 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ryan, |
| 17 |
Surely, at this point we aren't going to let all those bugs hold up |
| 18 |
gcc-4.3 stabilization? Most of which were only found via Diego's |
| 19 |
tinderboxing which implies that no user cares enough about the package |
| 20 |
to report a bug (or no one uses the package). I've been working on the |
| 21 |
gcc-4.3 stabilzation tracker and all the bugs now have arches CC'd on |
| 22 |
the bugs so, once the glibc-2.8 stab tracker is resolved (which Fauli |
| 23 |
has been working on) I think we should be good to mark gcc-4.3 stable. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-Jeremy |
Archives