Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:55:52
Message-Id: 20090210225627.4c3d96d2@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish by Jeremy Olexa
1 On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:51:14 -0600
2 Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
5 > wrote:
6 > > All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing
7 > > header) patches will be applied by me in the coming week. If you
8 > > have concerns about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my
9 > > hands first), please let me know.
10 > >
11 > > As always, applying these patches yourself makes me a happy monkey.
12 > >
13 > > I'll try to have this done by the end of the week. I will also
14 > > handle filing of stabilization bugs for these packages at the end of
15 > > February.
16 > >
17 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=198121&max
18 > > depth=1&hide_resolved=1
19 >
20 > Ryan,
21 > Surely, at this point we aren't going to let all those bugs hold up
22 > gcc-4.3 stabilization? Most of which were only found via Diego's
23 > tinderboxing which implies that no user cares enough about the package
24 > to report a bug (or no one uses the package). I've been working on the
25 > gcc-4.3 stabilzation tracker and all the bugs now have arches CC'd on
26 > the bugs so, once the glibc-2.8 stab tracker is resolved (which Fauli
27 > has been working on) I think we should be good to mark gcc-4.3 stable.
28
29 I'm going through the list and marking anything that i think should
30 block stabilization as P1. In the end though it's up to toolchain to
31 decide when they want to go ahead.
32
33
34 --
35 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
36 treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
37 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature