1 |
> On 28 Dec 2022, at 16:27, Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 28 Dec 2022, at 16:04, Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> - Before this commit, nothing pulls in app-alternatives/sh, so we're relying on |
8 |
>> app-shells/bash handling /bin/sh as an orphaned symlink (which is one of the big |
9 |
>> things we're trying to move away from). |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> - Add in the others (app-alternatives/{awk,bzip2,gzip,tar}) to allow setup |
12 |
>> via /etc/portage/package.use without adding these to @world manually, |
13 |
>> this also lays the ground work for at some point removing specific implementations |
14 |
>> in the future (after making sure ebuilds which need specific impls. depend on them). |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> - Note that there's two exceptions: |
17 |
>> 1. app-alternaitves/yacc |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> No need to explicitly add into @system, because we previously had virtual/yacc |
20 |
>> so it'll get pulled in by ebuild dependencies anyway. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> 2. app-alternatives/lex |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> We never had virtual/lex before and packages very often explicitly |
25 |
>> depend on sys-devel/flex. But this isn't a big deal given it's very unlikely |
26 |
>> that a user wants to try modify lex yet and reflex is still very new as an |
27 |
>> option in Gentoo. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> That is, as time goes on and we test more to ensure it works with any lex, |
30 |
>> it'll get pulled in as various ebuilds get updated anyway. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/886017 |
33 |
>> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/886247 |
34 |
>> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@g.o> |
35 |
>> --- |
36 |
>> profiles/base/packages | 9 ++++++--- |
37 |
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) |
38 |
>> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> FWIW, I'd like to push this today to avoid users having to deal |
41 |
> with the migration "twice" if they have eselect-sh installed, |
42 |
> given app-alternatives/* got stabled yesterday/early today. |
43 |
|
44 |
After discussion in #gentoo-pms, I'm going to push this |
45 |
with only the +s (i.e. keep gzip + bzip2 in @system for now), |
46 |
as PMS at least for gzip is clear it wants GNU gzip available, |
47 |
and it says "bzip2" must be as well. |
48 |
|
49 |
I'd like to revisit this another time and see about changing that |
50 |
if appropriate, but that's tangential to the reason I'm trying to do |
51 |
this quickly (minimising impact for users). |
52 |
|
53 |
I'll open a bug so we don't forget to do that revisiting. |