| 1 |
> On 28 Dec 2022, at 18:52, Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 28 Dec 2022, at 16:27, Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>> On 28 Dec 2022, at 16:04, Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> - Before this commit, nothing pulls in app-alternatives/sh, so we're relying on |
| 12 |
>>> app-shells/bash handling /bin/sh as an orphaned symlink (which is one of the big |
| 13 |
>>> things we're trying to move away from). |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> - Add in the others (app-alternatives/{awk,bzip2,gzip,tar}) to allow setup |
| 16 |
>>> via /etc/portage/package.use without adding these to @world manually, |
| 17 |
>>> this also lays the ground work for at some point removing specific implementations |
| 18 |
>>> in the future (after making sure ebuilds which need specific impls. depend on them). |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> - Note that there's two exceptions: |
| 21 |
>>> 1. app-alternaitves/yacc |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> No need to explicitly add into @system, because we previously had virtual/yacc |
| 24 |
>>> so it'll get pulled in by ebuild dependencies anyway. |
| 25 |
>>> |
| 26 |
>>> 2. app-alternatives/lex |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>> We never had virtual/lex before and packages very often explicitly |
| 29 |
>>> depend on sys-devel/flex. But this isn't a big deal given it's very unlikely |
| 30 |
>>> that a user wants to try modify lex yet and reflex is still very new as an |
| 31 |
>>> option in Gentoo. |
| 32 |
>>> |
| 33 |
>>> That is, as time goes on and we test more to ensure it works with any lex, |
| 34 |
>>> it'll get pulled in as various ebuilds get updated anyway. |
| 35 |
>>> |
| 36 |
>>> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/886017 |
| 37 |
>>> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/886247 |
| 38 |
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@g.o> |
| 39 |
>>> --- |
| 40 |
>>> profiles/base/packages | 9 ++++++--- |
| 41 |
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) |
| 42 |
>>> |
| 43 |
>> |
| 44 |
>> FWIW, I'd like to push this today to avoid users having to deal |
| 45 |
>> with the migration "twice" if they have eselect-sh installed, |
| 46 |
>> given app-alternatives/* got stabled yesterday/early today. |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> After discussion in #gentoo-pms, I'm going to push this |
| 49 |
> with only the +s (i.e. keep gzip + bzip2 in @system for now), |
| 50 |
> as PMS at least for gzip is clear it wants GNU gzip available, |
| 51 |
> and it says "bzip2" must be as well. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> I'd like to revisit this another time and see about changing that |
| 54 |
> if appropriate, but that's tangential to the reason I'm trying to do |
| 55 |
> this quickly (minimising impact for users). |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> I'll open a bug so we don't forget to do that revisiting. |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/888777 |
Archives