Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Gregory M. Turner" <gmt@×××××.us>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] OT: was Re: bash-3.1 stable
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:51:37
Message-Id: 516B24E0.5000903@malth.us
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: bash-3.1 stable by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 4/2/2013 10:54 AM, Duncan wrote:
2 > Tho in practice, if you're here long you do develop a rather thick hide.
3 > Nothing NEAR what it was a few years ago, tho. Before it gets anywhere
4 > near that, there's warnings, these days.
5
6 Kinda just what happens, when you put a bunch of unpaid, sleep-deprived,
7 anal-retentive engineers in a virtual project room and set them all
8 about trying to create stuff by tearing apart each others' work products
9 and rebuilding them to be "better".
10
11 Open source seems to arrive at consensus by means of a process something
12 like:
13
14 whiny trolling ->
15 unfettered troll-feeding ->
16 hyperbolic butt-hurt ->
17 (optional) finger-pointing and self-pity ->
18 reluctant compromise ->
19 write code -> (repeat)
20
21 Think of the above as the Open-Source equivalent of the Rational Unified
22 Process :)
23
24 -gmt

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: was Re: bash-3.1 stable Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>