Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:01:37
Message-Id: 20070621155537.11ee07c7@sed-192.sedsystems.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list by Mike Doty
1 Mike Doty wrote:
2 > Jim Ramsay wrote:
3 > > Mike Doty wrote:
4 > >> or you could ask infra to work it's magic making any post to
5 > >> -dev-announce post to -dev as well and set the replt-to address for
6 > >> -dev-announce to -dev. that way it's all automagic.
7 > >
8 > > I hope you meant the List-Post header... unless we would like to
9 > > have another discussion on the merits/evils of reply-to munging :)
10 > >
11 > As an announce list, you're NEVER EVER supposed to reply to the list,
12 > so reply-to munging in this case is appropriate IMO.
13
14 Reply-To is supposed to let you reply to the author, in case they need
15 to use a different return address than what is in the From header.
16 Which I grant is very rare for Gentoo developers.
17
18 But I do agree with you that if reply-to munging is done it should
19 indeed point at -dev and never the -announce list.
20
21 --
22 Jim Ramsay
23 Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature