Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:01:25
Message-Id: 201208181200.18310.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 *yawn* such a drama queen.
2
3 i never said "i am going to do this everyone else be damned". i did say "i
4 will probably do this soon". but that is why i posted to gentoo-dev in the
5 first place -- to get feedback from others.
6
7 gnutls breakage: not relevant. you're causing that breakage by not adding a
8 simple patch that most every other package has merged. conflating the issue to
9 a major ABI bump is also irrelevant.
10
11 boost breakage: if 1.50 is going to be unmasked soon, i can wait for that.
12
13 general breakage: we can't sit around waiting for all packages to get fixed.
14 if people aren't going to fix packages after being given notice, then they get
15 tree cleaned. not a big deal.
16 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch Nathan Zachary <nathanzachary@g.o>