| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> yes, the patch here is trivial. it removes 1 line of unused code and has fixed |
| 3 |
> a lot of other packages. deflecting the argument to a flawed system of your own |
| 4 |
> creation doesn't change it. if you're worried about gnutls breakage, you've |
| 5 |
> only yourself to blame. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'm worried that one developer thinks that he can make a change to |
| 8 |
_the_ base library for the tree over a weekend, without informing |
| 9 |
anybody else of his plan if not one day before. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm worried that Gentoo's health depends on the whim of a person who |
| 12 |
can't see the needs of others and only care about his own. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So unless you're so full of yourself that you still think it's okay |
| 15 |
for you to do this by announcing it the day before, start actually |
| 16 |
working _with_ others instead than _against_ other: fix your crap that |
| 17 |
is blocking glibc 2.16, and see how soon the others can fix theirs. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If you can't do that, then I'd suggest you step down and take a |
| 20 |
vacation, because you're totally out of your mind. |
Archives