| 1 |
On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use |
| 4 |
> > 1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers choice. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> [...] |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge. |
| 9 |
> > so any errors here are of your choosing. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> So you pretend that people apply "trivial patches" because you're in a |
| 12 |
> hurry to unmask something |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
yes, the patch here is trivial. it removes 1 line of unused code and has fixed |
| 15 |
a lot of other packages. deflecting the argument to a flawed system of your own |
| 16 |
creation doesn't change it. if you're worried about gnutls breakage, you've |
| 17 |
only yourself to blame. |
| 18 |
-mike |
Archives