| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50 |
| 3 |
> is purely the boost's maintainers choice. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
[...] |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge. so |
| 8 |
> any errors here are of your choosing. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
So you pretend that people apply "trivial patches" because you're in a |
| 11 |
hurry to unmask something, but when it's time to actually do some |
| 12 |
fixing yourself you procrastinate because you don't like the way the |
| 13 |
bug is open? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
What a team player uh? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Just for the sake of argument, why don't you instead look at |
| 18 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=421391&hide_resolved=1 |
| 19 |
and see that two bugs blocking the tracker are actually from herds |
| 20 |
you're part of? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
And on https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=boost-1.50&hide_resolved=1 |
| 23 |
I count four just for games. |
Archives