Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:45:27
Message-Id: 201208180144.09328.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
2 > - everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need
3 > 1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50);
4
5 there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50
6 is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
7
8 > - everything depending on gnutls (current 2.x version does not build
9 > with glibc 2.16, and quite a few things don't build with gnutls 3);
10
11 there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge. so
12 any errors here are of your choosing.
13
14 > Congrats, this is just the kind of behaviour that makes Gentoo look
15 > professional... no wait I meant the other way around I guess. Because
16 > the automake 1.12 breakage is not enough to have in tree, hm?
17
18 *yawn*. don't use unstable if you want stability.
19 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>