1 |
On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> - everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need |
3 |
> 1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50); |
4 |
|
5 |
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50 |
6 |
is purely the boost's maintainers choice. |
7 |
|
8 |
> - everything depending on gnutls (current 2.x version does not build |
9 |
> with glibc 2.16, and quite a few things don't build with gnutls 3); |
10 |
|
11 |
there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge. so |
12 |
any errors here are of your choosing. |
13 |
|
14 |
> Congrats, this is just the kind of behaviour that makes Gentoo look |
15 |
> professional... no wait I meant the other way around I guess. Because |
16 |
> the automake 1.12 breakage is not enough to have in tree, hm? |
17 |
|
18 |
*yawn*. don't use unstable if you want stability. |
19 |
-mike |